What a collection agency actually returns.
A traditional agency recovers a small share of what you hand over and keeps a large share of what it recovers. Practices rarely run the arithmetic because the alternative — writing the account off — feels like the same outcome with less paperwork. It isn’t.
Results are instant · No email · Nothing stored
| Traditional agency | RevAmp | |
|---|---|---|
| Past-due accounts annually | — | — |
| Average outstanding balance | — | — |
| Total outstanding annually | — | — |
| Percentage recovered | — | — |
| Revenue collected | — | — |
| Cost to collect | — | — |
| Total annual cost to collect | — | — |
| Net to the practice | — | — |
Why the cost line is the interesting one
An agency taking 35 to 50 cents on the dollar is not unusual — it is the standard arrangement, and it is priced that way because the agency is carrying the risk and the labour. The difference in this model is not that we are cheaper for the sake of it; it is that past-due patients are instructed to pay you directly rather than the agency, so the money does not make a detour through someone else’s trust account before reaching you.
The other difference does not appear in the table at all. You decide when collection activity starts, when it stops, and whether each account is handled diplomatically or intensively. Harsh collection usually costs a practice the patient — and the referrals that came with them.
Next: telehealth
The simplest of the four calculators, and usually the one that surprises people.